Leaked draft shows US court set to strike down abortion rights—report
The Supreme Court is poised to strike down the right to abortion in the United States, according to a bombshell leaked draft of a majority opinion that sparked protests through the night and swift condemnation from leading Democrats.
The draft opinion that would shred nearly 50 years of constitutional protections was written by Justice Samuel Alito and has been circulating inside the conservative-dominated court since February, news outlet Politico reported Monday, May 2.
The leak of a draft opinion, while a case is still pending, is an extraordinary breach.
The 98-page draft majority opinion calls the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision enshrining the right to abortion "egregiously wrong from the start."
"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Alito writes in the document, labeled as the Opinion of the Court and published on Politico's website. "It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people's elected representatives."
In Roe v. Wade, the nation's highest court held that access to abortion is a constitutional right.
In a 1992 ruling, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court guaranteed a woman's right to an abortion until the fetus is viable outside the womb, which is typically around 22 to 24 weeks of gestation.
"Abortion presents a profound moral question," Alito wrote. "The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion."
"The inescapable conclusion is that a right to an abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation's history and traditions," he said.
Reproductive rights have been under threat in the United States in recent months as Republican-led states move to tighten restrictions, with some seeking to ban all abortions after six weeks, before many women even know they are pregnant.
Senior Democrats denounced the court's apparent move to overturn abortion rights.
"If the report is accurate, the Supreme Court is poised to inflict the greatest restriction of rights in the past fifty years—not just on women but on all Americans," Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a joint statement.
"The Republican-appointed Justices' reported votes to overturn Roe v. Wade would go down as an abomination, one of the worst and most damaging decisions in modern history."
Right-wing politicians have launched an assault on abortion, with Democrats, led by President Joe Biden, fighting back to protect access to the procedure.
In December, hearing oral arguments about a Mississippi law that would ban most abortions after 15 weeks, the Supreme Court's conservative majority appeared inclined to not only uphold the law but to toss out Roe v. Wade.
'Mostly just mad'
The nine-member court, dominated 6-3 by conservatives following the nomination of three justices by former president Donald Trump, is expected to issue a decision in the Mississippi case by June.
Politico, citing a person familiar with the court's deliberations, said four other conservative justices—Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—had voted with Alito, the author of the first draft of the majority opinion.
It said the three liberal justices on the court were working on a dissent and it was unknown how Chief Justice John Roberts would ultimately vote.
Politico stressed the document it obtained is a draft and justices do sometimes change their votes before a final ruling.
Late Monday night, several hundred people, including abortion rights supporters and anti-choice demonstrators, gathered outside the Supreme Court building.
The pro-choice group chanted "My body, my choice!"
"We need access to safe abortion because making it illegal isn't going to stop it, it's just going to make it more dangerous," said 23-year-old Abby Korb, a graduate student and congressional aide.
Madeline Hren, a 25-year-old from North Carolina, said she was "really upset" when she heard the news.
"You know, I didn't cry," she said. "I'm mostly just mad."
Unprecedented leak
The leak of a draft opinion is extraordinary while a case is still being decided. Politico said it was the first time in modern history a draft opinion had been disclosed publicly.
Neil Katyal, who served as solicitor general under former president Barack Obama, on Twitter called the move the "equivalent of the Pentagon Papers leak," in a reference to the leaked documents outlining US involvement in Vietnam.
Asked about the draft being circulated, a Supreme Court spokeswoman said: "The Court has no comment."
The Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice research group, has said that 26 states are "certain or likely" to ban abortion if Roe v. Wade is overturned.
Democratic governors of several states including California, New Mexico, and Michigan announced plans to enshrine abortion rights even if the court overturns Roe v. Wade.
"We are proposing an amendment to enshrine the right to choose in the California constitution. We can't trust SCOTUS to protect the right to abortion, so we'll do it ourselves. Women will remain protected here," California governor Gavin Newsom tweeted.
New York governor Kathy Hochul said it was "an absolutely disgraceful attack on our fundamental right to choose."
"Let me be loud and clear: New York will always guarantee your right to abortion. You have our word," she said on Twitter.
Planned Parenthood, which operates abortion clinics around the country, said the draft opinion was "outrageous" but cautioned that it "is not final."
Josh Hawley, a conservative Republican senator from Missouri, welcomed the Politico report.
"If this is the Court's opinion, it's a heck of an opinion," Hawley said. "Voluminously researched, tightly argued, and morally powerful." (AFP)